Melanie Deziel, founder of the Overlap League, is a content strategist who has made it her mission to bring the tools, tactics, and best practices of journalism to branded content, marketing, and sales team.
According to her, this will add more value to the content, but actually, the standard for branded content and native ads are almost higher than that of editorial content. And there are definitely differences between the two worlds: editorial and commercial.
***Melanie Deziel will be among speakers from around the world at Native Advertising DAYS from 8-10 November. As a member of FIPP, you are entitled to a discount of €100 discount on the ticket purchase to the Native Advertising DAYS event by using the promo code FIPP17. Get your discounted ticket here***
When we’re talking about native advertising hosted on a publisher’s platform, the key is to have that content take on the form and function of the surrounding content, so that it offers the same level of value for readers, listeners or viewers.
Journalists are very skilled at this: they focus on making the story appealing to readers, filling in gaps in reader knowledge, and adapting their writing style to fit the various publications where they work.
Brands should approach their content in the same way, acknowledging that their content needs to rise to the level of quality that their host publication has set, editorially, in order to be valued by the readers in the same way.
On an even deeper level, though, the standards for branded content or native ads are almost higher. While consumers usually seek out content they like and trust from reputable publishers, they rarely seek out brand stories and likely approach them with a fair level of scepticism.
This means that brands have an extra responsibility to make their content fair, accurate, trustworthy and valuable so as to overcome the scepticism with which their readers may be approaching their content.
While brands and marketers should certainly take lessons and best practices from the world of journalism, they should NOT simply impersonate journalists.
Of course, transparency is key—editorially or commercially—and anyone marketers are interviewing or talking to when they report a story should clearly understand that the content they’re producing is commercial in nature.
All of this is also contingent upon the fact that there is a necessary separation between those who report and create editorial content and those who report or create branded content. Someone trusted by readers to produce unbiased content about an industry should not also be paid to write branded content for that same industry; it would create clear problems for readers ability to trust either type of content they create.
And since the perception of a conflict of interest is nearly as damaging as an actual conflict of interest, it’s important to create those separations, but also to communicate them clearly to your internal and external stakeholders too.
To be clear, there are so many things that are different about these two worlds. When I talk about marketers learning from journalists, I’m largely referring to their processes, their best practices, tools they might use, and their standards. Still, they live in two different worlds, as they should.
Obviously, I don’t think journalists should ever take money from a person, company or other organisation in exchange for positive, altered or otherwise biased coverage, the way a branded content producer does by their nature. Most journalists I know would never do such a thing, as it compromises their integrity.
On the other side of things, while many journalists spend time trying to dig and uncover previously unreported wrongdoing, crimes, and other frowned-upon behaviours, I don’t think branded content producers should spend their time and efforts trying to damage a company that they intend on keeping as a client.
But there’s no reason both sides can’t have a thorough reporting process, strive to tell interesting stories, choose reliable and trustworthy sources, look to data to surface story ideas, put their readers’ interests first, have thorough copy editing, leverage different multimedia formats and be strategic about how they promote their content to ensure it gets seen.
At the end of the day, journalists aim to tell objective stories, and branded content producers aim to tell stories that fit marketing objectives. It doesn’t mean both kinds of content can’t be interesting, valuable and truthful, but it does mean that the content these two types of storytellers create is somewhat different.
The key, I think is to ask yourself what your audience doesn’t know, and ask how you can provide something of value to them.
In journalism, we teach reporters to “Show, don’t tell,” meaning you should find examples, people, places and stories that SHOW the point you’re trying to make, so you don’t have to be the one to simply claim it’s true without evidence.
Brands should think about their content in the same way. Don’t tell us that you are helpful, smart, innovative, making our lives easier, giving back in your community: SHOW us through examples, stories, and providing that value to us.
If you’re just hopping on the bandwagon and using a story as a soft opening for your sales pitch, your audience your audience will see right through that.
There are certainly challenges in these types of content partnerships, and a lot of my consulting work is focused on helping publishers and brands work together more efficiently so they can tell better stories together.
Some of the challenges for publishers are around selling: Figuring out what “native” means and looks like on their platform, equipping their sales team with the right language and materials to properly pitch native content to their clients, ensuring that the concepts they sell through will resonate with their audience, and designing promotion and distribution plans that make the best use of their audience and ad tech resources.
Some of the brand challenges involve being willing to let go of creative control and let the publisher content team create content, having a clear understanding of their goals and being transparent about them up front, focusing on stories that are valuable to readers, and being patient and understanding that the best content programs happen over time so that you can learn, test, and adapt according to the data.
When someone introduces you to their friend, you don’t immediately start talking about yourself, list 10 reasons why you’re great, and end with a formal request to be friends. It’s just not natural. So when a publisher is willing to introduce you to their audience, ask what value you can bring to them and how you can create an authentic connection with them.
There are so many great sessions as Native Ad Days, you really can’t go wrong, but I think my session will be incredibly valuable for anyone who wants to tell deeper, more authentic brand stories.
***Meet and hear more from Melanie Deziel at the Native Advertising DAYS in Berlin. Register now using your FIPP member promo code FIPP17 to receive a discount of €100***
More like this
According to figures provided by Ipsos in its "Favorability Study", almost 50 per cent of Americans come out in favour of the press, which has been heavily criticised by incumbent President Donald Trump during and before taking office in January of this year.16th Oct 2017 Insight News
In this week's Media Voices podcast, the University of Oregon's Carolyn S. Chambers professor in journalism Damian Radcliffe takes us through his latest report into local journalism in the Pacific Northwest.16th Oct 2017 Insight News
Magnetic’s New Influencer Ecosystem research topped the FIPP Insight Awards presented at the annual FIPP Insight Awards presented at the FIPP World Congress in London on 11 October 2017. Gold award winners included Magazine Networks Australia’s Passion Response Study and Time Inc. UK’s Live the Passion research.11th Oct 2017 Insight News
Annie Granatstein, head of WP BrandStudio at the Washington Post, knows how to run a native ad team and how to turn a profit. Here, she pours out some of her important knowledge on selling native advertising.8th Oct 2017 Insight News
Magazines are a shortcut to quality and continues to deliver top results for advertisers, according to Linda Thomas Brooks, CEO at MPA, USA, said during a keynote on the second day of the FIPP World Congress in London (11 October) last week.16th Oct 2017 Features
“No other industry predicted its own doom as much as print media. The magazine is not dying, but it may be killing itself.”10th Oct 2017 Features
“Smart repackaging” and "content swarming" are the main ways that Hearst UK’s titles are trying to reach a greater audience - and it’s working, according to Betsy Fast. Betsy, who recently moved from Hearst US to become Executive Director of Digital Editorial Strategy at Hearst UK, shared her insights from the stage on day two of the 41st FIPP World Congress (11 October).13th Oct 2017 Features
Ralph Büchi, Chief Operating Officer (COO) of the Ringier Group and CEO of Ringier Axel Springer Switzerland, has been elected as the new Chairman of FIPP – the network for global media. The chairmanship of the international magazine media association was passed to Büchi after Erwin Fidelis Reisch, president & CEO of Alfons W. Gentner Verlag completed his term as FIPP chairman.11th Oct 2017 FIPP News
We are at the 41st FIPP World Congress, taking place from 9-11 October. If you were unable to make it to London, here are some ways you can follow news from there.8th Oct 2017 FIPP News
Visit our Youtube channelFIND OUT MORE
FIPP newsletters allow you to keep up with industry trends, research, training and events across the worldFIND OUT MORE
Get global coverage of your launches, company news and innovationsFIND OUT MORE
What’s happening now, what’s coming next